Browse/search for people

Publication - Mr Tom Reid

    Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information

    Citation

    Chan, DSY, Willicombe, A, Reid, TD, Beaton, C, Arnold, D, Ward, J, Davies, IL & Lewis, WG, 2012, ‘Relative quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information’. Journal of Cancer Education, vol 27., pp. 676-9

    Abstract

    Internet-derived health care information is increasingly accessed by patients, yet its quality and accuracy is variable and unregulated. The aim of this study was to assess the information available regarding common gastrointestinal cancers via three internet search engines (Google, Yahoo and Bing). The top 30 websites for each of the terms: oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic, colon and rectal cancer were evaluated (University of Michigan Consumer Health Website Checklist) and scored [-80 (poor) to 90 (excellent)]. The median score was 53 (-7 to 81) and was significantly higher for oesophageal (61) and pancreatic (65) cancer websites, compared with gastric (49), colon (48) and rectal cancer (50) (p = 0.014). Median scores related to charitable organisations were significantly better than academic, commercial, news agency, care provider, layperson and medical information websites collectively (79 vs. 42, p < 0.0001). Overall quality of internet-derived gastrointestinal cancer information remains poor and patients and clinicians should be aware.

    Full details in the University publications repository