Browse/search for people

Publication - Dr Jeremy Horwood

    Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials

    Citation

    Richards, D, Bazeley, P, Borglin, G, Craig, P, Emsley, R, Frost, J, Hill, J, Horwood, JP, Hutchings, H, Jinks, C, Montgomery, A, Moore, G, Clark, V, Tonkin-Crine, S, Wade, J, Warren, FC, Wyke, S, Young, B & O'Cathain, A, 2019, ‘Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials’. BMJ Open.

    Abstract

    It is common to undertake qualitative research alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) when evaluating complex interventions. Researchers tend to analyse these datasets separately and then consider their findings separately within the discussion section of the final report, rarely integrating quantitative and qualitative data or findings, and missing opportunities to integrate data in order to generate further important insights about the intervention under evaluation.

    This paper reports on a two day expert meeting funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research with the aims to identify current strengths and weaknesses in the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods in clinical trials, establish the next steps required to provide the trials community with guidance on the integration of mixed methods in RCTs and set-up a network of individuals, groups and organisations willing to collaborate on related methodological activity.

    We summarise integration techniques and highlight the potential value of integration using three examples. We suggest that applying mixed methods integration techniques to data or findings from studies involving both RCTs and qualitative research can yield insights that might be useful for understanding variation in outcomes, the mechanism by which interventions have an impact, and identifying ways of tailoring therapy to patient preference and type. Given a general lack of examples and knowledge of these techniques, researchers and funders will need future guidance on how to undertake and appraise them.

    Full details in the University publications repository